Why Community May Be Better for Engagement Than Acquisition
Flanagan challenges the claim that community will become a broadly scalable customer-acquisition channel. Large acquisition impact requires substantial member volume and activity, yet communities often become more valuable and authentic when they remain small, focused, and highly engaged.
- Meaningful acquisition requires enough active members to generate conversion volume.
- Most communities never reach the scale necessary to drive major growth directly.
- Smaller communities often sustain stronger relevance and authenticity.
- Community can still produce important indirect engagement and retention benefits.
“And there is not that many large communities in the world because communities, and you're the expert here, are much better and are much more…”
“I always think it's going to be a tool for engagement versus a tool for acquisition of new customers.”