Why Paying With USDC Weakened the Solana Store Experience
Kip identifies a disconnect between the store’s branding and its payment flow: purchases were settled in USDC rather than Solana. Kieran suggests token volatility and operational complexity may explain the decision, but the experience still failed to showcase the branded asset directly.
- The Solana-branded store accepted USDC for Kip’s purchase
- Using a stablecoin likely reduced volatility and accounting complexity
- The payment still relied indirectly on Solana infrastructure
- The mismatch made the activation feel less authentic
“No, I didn't pay in Solana at the Solana store.”
“I'm sure it's first cost control and other things, but it's weird to go into a branded store of this experience, and I'm not using…”