18 October 2022

Marketing Team Structures For Every Stage of Your Company

2Frameworks

7Insights

Frameworks in this episode

Leadership6 steps

Autonomous Team Design Test

Give each team the ownership and capabilities required to deliver its goals.

Read →

Strategy5 steps

Strategy-Led Team Design

Reshape your marketing organization around the strategy it must execute.

Read →

Insights & moments

The myth-busts, hot takes, explainers, and tools worth keeping.

Hot Take· 1

Hot Take23:30

Why Eliminating Every Manager Is an Overcorrection

Discussing Elon Musk's approach to Twitter, Kip argues against eliminating management entirely. Temporary overcorrection may expose excessive overhead, but organizations still need a workable balance between leaders and individual contributors.

Too much managerial overhead can slow execution.
Removing all managers is not a durable solution.
Short-term overcorrection can reveal a better balance.
Organizations need both leadership and core individual-contributor capacity.

“I would not do that”
Kip Bodnar · 24:00

“you want to look at the right balance of kind of overhead manager leader folks as well as kind of core individual contributor folks”
Kip Bodnar · 24:00

#management#individual contributors#twitter#overhead

Explainer· 3

Explainer03:30

Why Information Flow Is Not the Same as Team Design

Kip separates organizational structure from the operating system used to communicate, meet, and share information. Both affect performance, but changing reporting lines will not by itself repair weak information flow.

Structure defines ownership and organizational relationships.
The operating system defines communication and meeting practices.
Both problems matter but require different interventions.
Do not restructure solely to fix communication habits.

“I fundamentally think that is like your team operating system like how you communicate how you share information how you meet”
Kip Bodnar · 04:00

#communication#operations#leadership

Explainer04:30

Why Growing Companies Create Internal Lobbyists

Lobbyists emerge when people responsible for future initiatives lack direct control over the resources required to advance them. Some advocacy is healthy, but adding more coordinators instead of delivery capacity eventually overwhelms builders and stresses operational teams.

Future-facing work competes with current priorities.
People without execution control resort to advocacy.
A small number of lobbyists can bridge strategic horizons.
Too many lobbyists divert builders from committed work.

“a lobbyist to somebody who has no control but is trying to get stuff done”
Kip Bodnar · 04:30

“if you feel like the lobbyists are starting to basically overtake the builders and the the core work that's happening boy you're in a real…”
Kip Bodnar · 05:00

#lobbyists#scaling#innovation#resources

Explainer10:30

The Structural Conflict Between Channel and Program Owners

Program teams often need distribution through channels whose owners have separate targets. The resulting competition for access creates recurring friction unless leadership aligns goals and makes collaboration rules explicit.

Brand and program teams depend on shared media channels.
Channel owners are measured against their own objectives.
Program success may require resources the program owner cannot control.
Shared goals can reduce competition for distribution.

“you have Channel owners and people who rely on those channels”
Kieran Flanagan · 10:30

“a lot of the friction has come from Channel owners and program owners”
Kieran Flanagan · 11:00

#channels#programs#distribution#alignment

Q&A· 1

Q&A16:00

Should an Org Structure Bend Around an Exceptional Leader?

Kieran warns that assigning unrelated scope to a high-capacity leader can undermine a carefully designed organization, especially at scale. Kip counters that remarkable leaders are genuine organizational advantages and can justify unconventional but rational alignment when the combined work has a coherent purpose.

Exceptional capacity alone does not justify unrelated scope.
Larger organizations pay a higher price for structural misalignment.
Strong leaders can make unconventional alignments work.
Any expanded remit still needs a defensible organizational rationale.

“I would build team structure agnostic of incredible leaders and then five incredible leaders that fit with your team structure”
Kieran Flanagan · 16:30

“your job is to always lean into the strengths that you have”
Kip Bodnar · 17:00

#leadership#org structure#talent#scale

Takeaway· 2

Takeaway01:45

The Phrases That Reveal a Team Design Problem

Uncertainty, conflicting goals, cross-functional misalignment, and blame are presented as practical warning signs of structural trouble. Leaders should treat repeated complaints about other teams as evidence to investigate ownership and interfaces rather than dismissing them as attitude problems.

Listen for uncertainty about responsibilities.
Investigate goals that conflict across teams.
Treat sales or product misalignment as structural evidence.
Notice when finger-pointing becomes routine.

“if you start hearing those phrases you have a team design problem”
Kip Bodnar · 02:00

“the more the fingers come out to point the worse your team design and team communication is”
Kieran Flanagan · 02:00

#org design#alignment#diagnostics

Takeaway19:30

Put Early Initiatives With Builders Before Optimizing the Org Chart

The hosts resolve their disagreement by distinguishing company stage from initiative stage. A new project inside a large company may need to sit with the strongest builder initially, even if the placement is structurally unusual; once it scales, it should move into a durable organizational home.

Judge the maturity of the initiative, not only the company.
Prioritize execution during incubation.
Place new work with someone capable of building it.
Fit the initiative into a coherent structure after it proves itself.

“it needs to be with the builder for the first year or two”
Kip Bodnar · 20:00

“early stage Builder team structure does not matter execution matters”
Kieran Flanagan · 20:30

#builders#incubation#execution#growth