MMarketing Against The Grain
← All frameworks
Leadership

Character Capital and the Eulogy Test

Build trust repeatedly, then audit whether people would stand beside you in a crisis.

Difficulty
Expert
Time to result
~ongoing to results
Steps
6
Confidence
95%

Character capital is the trust accumulated when someone repeatedly treats people well, honors commitments, and acts consistently across roles. The eulogy test audits that capital by asking what colleagues, partners, friends, and family would honestly say about the person's impact if a defining crisis occurred today. Gaps between intended identity and likely testimony become targets for behavioral change. The person then selects observable practices—keeping commitments, sharing credit, supporting people under pressure, or correcting harm—and repeats them over time. The mechanism is cumulative rather than transactional: reliable conduct builds relationships before support is needed. Its output is not guaranteed allegiance, but a stronger network of people who have firsthand reasons to trust and stand beside the person.

Origin

Extracted from Marketing Against The Grain after the hosts considered employee support for Sam Altman and his description of experiencing his own eulogy.

Core principles

  • 01Character compounds through repeated behavior.
  • 02People remember how a leader affects their lives.
  • 03Crisis reveals relationship strength built beforehand.
  • 04Leadership should be evaluated across every important role.

How to run it

  1. 1

    Map your important roles

    List the roles through which people experience you, such as leader, colleague, partner, friend, spouse, or family member.

    Pro tip Include roles outside work so the audit covers the whole person.

    Watch out A strong reputation in one role does not erase harmful behavior in another.

  2. 2

    Run the eulogy test

    Write what people in each role would probably say about how you affected them based on current evidence, not aspiration.

    Pro tip Use specific incidents that those people might remember.

    Watch out Do not write the flattering version you hope they would say.

  3. 3

    Find the trust gaps

    Compare the likely testimony with the person you intend to be. Identify repeated behaviors creating the largest gaps.

    Pro tip Ask a trusted person for one example that confirms or challenges your assessment.

    Watch out Seeking feedback is useless if disagreement is punished.

  4. 4

    Choose observable practices

    Translate desired character into behaviors others can experience, such as keeping commitments, telling difficult truths respectfully, or supporting people during setbacks.

    Pro tip Choose a small number of practices you can repeat consistently.

    Watch out Grand gestures do not compensate for unreliable everyday behavior.

  5. 5

    Repair specific harm

    Acknowledge important failures, make amends where possible, and change the behavior that caused them.

    Pro tip Let the affected person define whether the repair is meaningful.

    Watch out An apology without changed conduct does not rebuild trust.

  6. 6

    Compound character capital

    Repeat reliable behavior across ordinary and difficult situations, then revisit the eulogy test periodically.

    Pro tip Pay particular attention to conduct when there is no immediate reward.

    Watch out Do not treat relationships as deposits made solely to purchase future loyalty.

In the wild

Employees support a removed leader

Following Sam Altman's removal from OpenAI, more than 700 employees indicated willingness to follow him to Microsoft. The hosts treated this costly, voluntary support as evidence that his past conduct and leadership had built substantial trust before the crisis arrived.

The employees' response demonstrated how accumulated character and relationships can become decisive support during an uncontrollable event.

A leader audits likely testimony

A founder writes what employees, a partner, and close friends would honestly say if asked how the founder shows up under pressure. The founder notices a pattern of broken small commitments, apologizes to affected people, and adopts a weekly commitment review.

Repeated follow-through gradually aligns the founder's intended character with other people's lived experience.

Common mistakes

Trying to purchase loyalty

Character capital is an outcome of genuine repeated conduct, not a transactional strategy for making people indebted.

Judging yourself by intention

Other people experience behavior and impact, not private motives. Ground the audit in concrete examples.

Waiting for a crisis

Trust needed during adversity must be built through ordinary interactions long before the crisis occurs.

Is it for you?

Best for

It is best for leaders and partners seeking durable trust rather than short-term compliance.

Not ideal for

It is not ideal as a tactic for manufacturing loyalty or avoiding accountability for harmful conduct.

From the transcript

my biggest takeaway from this story is that like character matters.

Host · 26:00

Doing the right thing for people over and over again means that when you need them, they show up for you.

Host · 26:30

Am I showing up as a leader, as a partner, as a wife, husband, what have you, the way that I should be to have…

Host · 27:00

From the episode

How Firing Sam Altman Triggered OpenAI’s Downfall (#176)