Repetition-First Voice Adoption Scorecard
Prioritize frequent typing workflows and prove value with speed and time saved.
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Time to result
- ~weeks to results
- Steps
- 7
- Confidence
- 97%
This scorecard begins with workflow frequency rather than technological novelty. Users inventory repetitive typing tasks, estimate how many words and minutes each consumes, and compare their measured typing throughput with practical dictation throughput after corrections. High-volume workflows such as email, support, messaging, and AI prompting receive priority because small per-item savings compound daily. The episode offers a benchmark of roughly 180 to 200 dictated words per minute against about 40 typed words per minute, but the framework requires personal measurement rather than blind acceptance of averages. A focused pilot then tests time saved, output quality, correction burden, comfort, and habit formation. Expansion happens only after the first recurring workflow demonstrates durable value.
Origin
Alan uses dashboard words-per-minute data and Willow's continued use for founder-led customer support to quantify the benefit of repetitive voice workflows. Extracted from Marketing Against The Grain.
Core principles
- 01Start where typing volume and repetition are highest.
- 02Measure actual throughput instead of relying on novelty.
- 03Compare dictated words per minute with typed words per minute.
- 04Include correction time when estimating real savings.
- 05Build the dictation habit in one recurring workflow before expanding.
- 06Value reduced effort and improved mood alongside minutes saved.
How to run it
- 1
Inventory repetitive typing
List the recurring tasks that require the most written output during a normal day or week.
Pro tip Start with email, customer support, messaging, documentation, and AI prompts.
Watch out Do not prioritize a flashy use case that occurs only occasionally.
- 2
Establish the typing baseline
Measure the words and time required for representative examples of each workflow.
Pro tip Use real work rather than a generic typing test.
Watch out Ignoring thinking and correction time can distort the baseline.
- 3
Measure dictated throughput
Complete comparable tasks with voice input and include review and correction time.
Pro tip Track both raw words per minute and end-to-end completion time.
Watch out A high transcription speed is meaningless if cleanup consumes the savings.
- 4
Score the opportunity
Rank workflows by frequency, word volume, time saved, acceptable quality, and ease of speaking in the work environment.
Pro tip Give repeated daily work more weight than rare long documents.
Watch out Do not overlook privacy or social constraints on speaking aloud.
- 5
Pilot one workflow
Use dictation consistently for the highest-scoring task until the new trigger becomes habitual.
Pro tip Attach dictation to a stable cue, such as opening an email reply.
Watch out Switching every workflow simultaneously can make the cultural adjustment harder.
- 6
Review the full result
Evaluate time saved, response quality, correction rate, fatigue, and subjective comfort.
Pro tip Include whether the workflow makes the job feel better, not only faster.
Watch out A short novelty period may overstate long-term adoption.
- 7
Expand deliberately
Add the next-highest-scoring workflow after the first produces reliable benefits.
Pro tip Reuse dictionaries and learned preferences across related workflows.
Watch out Retain typing for tasks where it remains more precise or socially suitable.
In the wild
The Willow founders continue answering roughly 50 customer emails per day. Because support replies are frequent and text-heavy, they dictate responses through their own product instead of typing each one.
→ They maintain direct founder involvement in support while preserving time for other work.
A manager measures 40 typed words per minute and 180 dictated words per minute across email and Slack, then includes review time in both measurements. The manager pilots dictation only for longer replies and tracks the resulting daily savings for two weeks.
→ The manager obtains a defensible estimate of where dictation helps and where typing remains faster.
Common mistakes
Using benchmark speed as personal proof
The stated averages are directional. Actual value depends on speaking speed, correction burden, task complexity, and environment.
Starting with low-frequency novelty
Occasional creative demonstrations may be impressive but will not necessarily produce meaningful daily savings. Begin with repeated work.
Ignoring the habit-change cost
The host reports that adopting dictation required a cultural adjustment. A short, focused pilot is more realistic than expecting immediate total replacement.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for professionals handling large recurring volumes of email, support replies, messages, prompts, or documentation.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal for workflows dominated by short codes, tables, exact symbols, or infrequent text entry.
From the transcript
“Right now, I say voice AI works better for very repetitive workflows, like you know, messaging, email, prompting AI.”
“So that's literally a four to five times increase in speed and productivity and time saved just by using dictation rather than having to type…”
“the biggest life hack for us has just been using our own product Willow to be responding to those emails.”
From the episode
Everyone’s Using AI Wrong – This Is the Real Unlock