The Event Marketing Barbell
Choose intimate gatherings or flagship events while avoiding the costly middle.
- Difficulty
- Moderate
- Time to result
- ~months to results
- Steps
- 5
- Confidence
- 96%
The Event Marketing Barbell divides event investment between two defensible extremes. At one end are intimate gatherings of roughly 10 to 30 people, designed around a specific customer community or buying-committee role and held in restaurants or inexpensive spaces. Their economics work because coordination and production remain limited. At the other end are flagship events large enough to create meaningful business impact—approximately 500 or more attendees when tickets are sold, or around 1,000 or more for a free event. The framework advises avoiding the broad middle, where costs become substantial without the scale, revenue, or strategic impact needed to absorb mistakes. Event selection therefore begins with economics and desired influence rather than an arbitrary attendance goal.
Origin
Extracted from Marketing Against The Grain during a discussion of event production costs rising 20% to 45% and the resulting need to avoid economically vulnerable mid-sized events.
Core principles
- 01Stay out of the event market’s economically fragile middle.
- 02Make large events consequential enough to justify substantial production costs.
- 03Keep small events intimate, targeted, and operationally simple.
- 04Use small gatherings to influence specific members of buying committees.
- 05Set event size according to economics, not prestige.
How to run it
- 1
Define the event outcome
Specify the revenue, relationship, community, or buying-committee outcome the event must create.
Pro tip Tie intimate events to a particular role such as CFO, CEO, or head of sales.
Watch out Do not use attendance alone as the success criterion.
- 2
Choose an extreme
Select either a small, intimate gathering or a large flagship event. Avoid drifting into a mid-sized format without exceptional evidence.
Pro tip Use approximately 10 to 30 attendees for intimate events.
Watch out The middle carries substantial cost without guaranteed scale benefits.
- 3
Design the economics
Keep small events simple and inexpensive; give large events sufficient revenue or strategic impact to justify full production.
Pro tip Consider paid tickets at roughly 500-plus attendees and larger scale for free flagship events.
Watch out Do not build flagship production costs around optimistic attendance assumptions.
- 4
Curate the audience
Invite people whose participation advances the defined outcome. For intimate events, assemble peers who can discuss problems related to the product or market.
Pro tip Use role-specific gatherings to reach missing members of a buying committee.
Watch out A loosely targeted audience removes the primary advantage of a small event.
- 5
Apply a margin-of-error test
Stress-test attendance, cost, staffing, and conversion assumptions before committing. Proceed only if the format remains defensible under conservative estimates.
Pro tip Include current labor and material costs rather than historical event budgets.
Watch out Past event economics may no longer apply after production-cost inflation.
In the wild
A B2B company has support from marketers at several target accounts but needs CFO approval. Rather than organizing a 150-person regional conference, it hosts a 16-person restaurant dinner for finance leaders to discuss procurement and consolidation pressures. The venue and production requirements remain simple while the audience directly matches the sales obstacle.
→ The company influences a critical buying-committee role without accepting mid-sized conference economics.
A company with a large community chooses a 600-person ticketed summit rather than a collection of loosely differentiated 100-person events. Ticket revenue, sponsorships, and concentrated customer participation support professional production and create a meaningful annual moment.
→ Scale and revenue justify the event’s higher fixed costs.
Common mistakes
Choosing the middle by habit
A familiar mid-sized format may carry high production costs without the intimacy of a small event or the impact of a flagship.
Oversizing an intimate gathering
As attendance grows, coordination and venue requirements can erase the low-cost advantage that makes the small-event model work.
Ignoring the buying committee
A small event is less useful when invitations are not focused on the customer roles the business needs to influence.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for B2B marketers planning events amid rising production costs and expanding buying committees.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal for organizations with proven, repeatable economics for profitable mid-sized conferences.
From the transcript
“So you either want to do a really large event that has a meaningful impact on your business. You really go all in and you…”
“I think small is more like 10 to 30.”
“So what we are saying, everyone, is stay out of that kind of 40 to 50 person to 500 person event range because that is…”
From the episode
Ranking 2023's Top 6 Marketing Strategies